Conclusions & Recommendations
The facts about CO2 and temperature:
CO2 is a minuscule portion of atmospheric gases (0.04%) natural CO2 (97%) is by far the greatest quantity and total man-made emissions of CO2 of just 3% is not a significant factor in comparison. The UK's emissions of 1/10th of a molecule is completely trivial.
When we look at temperatures based on the IPPC hypotheses, that a doubling of CO2 from 280 parts per million (1959) to 560 parts per million will, increase global temperature by 1.5°C.
*The greatest increase would be natural at 1.455°C over the next 21.5 years.
Total man-made emissions responsible for an increase of 0.0436°C over the next 21.5 years.
UK emissions responsible for 0.0004°C over the next 21.5 years.*
Considering the hottest temperatures on Earth reach 47°C, and the coldest -79°C a spread of 126°C, nobody would notice a 1.5°C increase.
Nature 97 - Man 3, a massive natural victory.
How does the IPCC hypothesis hold up?
IPPC claim CO2 is a well-mixed gas in a dry atmosphere and a doubling of CO2 will increase temperatures by 1.5°C.
Firstly, their claim that Earth has a dry atmosphere is FALSE, from the empirical evidence shown in table 2 Relative Humidity (RH) shows the atmosphere of Earth has a RH of 50%.
Nature 100 - IPCC 0, a massacre by nature.
*Secondly, their claim of a well-mixed gas is FALSE, from the empirical evidence of the OCO2 satellite which shows CO2 is not a well-mixed gas in the atmosphere. It shows the natural process of the Carbon Cycle.
Nature 100 -IPCC 0, another massacre by nature.
Does CO2 increase temperature as the IPPC suggests?
Using the worlds longest running record of temperature (the CET 1659 to present) against the longest running record of carbon dioxide (Mauna Loa 1959-present) a plot of CET from 1959-present and CO2 from 1959 to present (Fig 2) shows the temperature has increased by 1.39°C. Considering the CET began during the little ice age, it is little surprise to understand the recovery from this cold period of time.
*To reach 1.5°C the natural process would be accountable for 1.4550°C
Man-made emissions accountable for 0.0436°C
UK emissions accountable for 0.0004°C*
Nature 97 - Man 3 another massive victory for nature.
In figure 3 a plot between CO2 and CET (1959-2021) shows a divergence between the two, where the CO2 trend is increasing greater than the temperature trend.
In figure 4 we see in the UK for the last 23 years, an increasing trend of CO2 and no temperature rise
Nature 100 - Man 0, yet another massive win for nature.
I really am not sure why the IPPC and "green" thinking people want to keep playing this game anymore.
From the conclusions of this empirical research I suggest NET ZERO CARBON is an absolute waste of time, effort, very expensive and will have dire consequences on the lives of a huge proportion of the world's western societies.
Globally countries adopting NET ZERO CARBON policies should abandon them immediately for the good of their populations. In the UK, where NET ZERO CARBON is incorporated into the Climate Change Act 2008 must be repealed immediately as there is NO empirical scientific evidence carbon dioxide is a problem.