Many people obatin their news about weather and climate change from main stream media (MSM). What happens when MSM publish headlines and articles telling stories which are "cut & paste" from activists? What also happens when journalists write pieces about weather and climate change but without any or very little investigation? Simply, you don't get the truth.
During November 2021 Glasgow will be hosting the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCC), Conference of the Parties (COP26).
Nobody can argue that the sun is the main provider of heat energy for the Earth.
According to NASA "by volume, in a dry atmosphere.., Water is highly variable, typically makes up about 1%"
The UNFCC and UNIPCC have a "fundamental" hypothesis that CO2 is a well-mixed gas in the atmosphere and rising man-made emissions will increase temperature to endanger the planet.
Weather fronts mark the boundaries between different air masses. On the 25th March 2020 there was a warm front over northwest Scotland at 1200 UTC, as seen in figure 1 to the right
We are constantly told, “increasing levels of CO2 increases temperature”. It is the mainstay of global warming advocacy. But is it true in the real world?
We are told by government, the media and eco-activists that our future energy needs (electricity) should come from "renewable energy", e.g. wind turbines or solar voltaic panels.
